Select a topic below:
( Green: Current Location)

• Introduction
• Background
• Fraud by Conduct
   • Churning
   • Switching
   • Twisting
   • Other
• Fraudulent Acts   and Practices
• Suitability
• Unregistered
  Securities

• Conclusion

Churning

Churning occurs in accounts holding traditional securities.

Churning of an account by a broker is a species of fraud. Churning occurs when a broker directing the volume and frequency of trades abuses the customer’s confidence for the broker’s own personal gain by initiating transactions that are excessive in view of the account’s character and its investment objectives as expressed to the broker. While an essential element of churning is the broker’s control of the customer’s account, the control need not be written discretionary control. It can be “de-facto” control of the account by the broker, in which the customer generally follows the recommendations of the broker or allows the broker to habitually make unauthorized transactions in the customer’s account, informing the customer later.

Churning more often occurs in margin accounts than in non-margin accounts because the calculation of the turn over rate, under most theories, is based upon the net assets in the account. As a rule of thumb, a net equity turn over rate of 6 times or more per year indicates churning. The required rate may be lower or higher depending on the character of the account and the investment objectives of the customer. Some customer margin accounts are funded by the deposit of large positions of investment stock or mutual funds, which are used as collateral to borrow money for the trading activity. In certain of these cases, the rate of turn over may be calculated using the trading portion of the account.

Churning is also characterized by in-and-out trading in the account, short holding periods, high turnover, high commissions, and high margin interest. A customer need not lose money in the account for the account to be churned.

An account that does not meet all of the criteria of churning, (i.e., the salesman did not control the account) may still need to be analyzed for suitable use of margin, suitable investment strategies and/or suitable recommendations.

Next topic: Fraud by Conduct: Switching

© 2006 by Vincent Law Office • General Email Account: info@vincentlawoffic e.com